Tunisia has voted to hand sweeping new powers to the country’s president, in a move that critics say risks the return of authoritarian rule to the country.
Less than a third of Tunisians voted in the referendum, with 94.6 per cent of those balloted supporting plans to hand President Kais Saied broad new powers.
But opposition groups, who boycotted the vote, said the results were “not credible” and “inflated”.
Mr Saied has claimed the changes will break Tunisia’s political paralysis.
The 64-year-old has already been ruling by decree since this time last year, when he dramatically moved to suspend Parliament and dismissed the government.
Tunisia’s new constitution would give the head of state full executive control, supreme command of the army and the ability to appoint a government without parliamentary approval.
It would also weaken Tunisia’s judiciary and remove checks on the powers of the presidency.
Mr Saied’s political rivals accused the country’s electoral board of “fraud” and said they would not recognise the newly approved constitution – which is expected to come into force when the final poll results are published.
Mr Saied and the Tunisian electoral commission have yet to comment on the accusations.
Critics feared the new constitution will codify the president’s newly-acquired authority, reducing the constraints on his personal powers and eroding the country’s relatively young democracy.
“Saied falsified the popular will by falsifying the results,” said Nejib Chebbi, head of the opposition National Salvation Front. He added that the initial results were “inflated and don’t fit with what observers saw on the ground”.
Many supported the changes in the hope that the new constitution would mark a new chapter, freeing Tunisia from the political bickering and government paralysis and reducing the influence of the country’s largest Islamist party.
Speaking after the vote on Tuesday, Mr Saied told supporters that “Tunisia has entered a new phase” and pledged that “all those who have committed crimes against the country will be held accountable for their actions”.
But Mr Saied claimed that “there was a large crowd in the polling stations and the rate would have been higher if the vote took place over two days”. -BBC