The former Chief Executive Officer (CEO ) of the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), Dr Stephen Opuni, has, once again, filed a motion asking Justice Clemence Jackson Honyenuga to recuse himself from hearing the GH¢217-million financial loss case involving the procurement of fertiliser for the company, for allegedly exhibiting “bias tendencies and open hostility” toward him.
Dr Opuni, who is standing trial together with businessman Seidu Agongo and facing 27 charges, additionally, claims the Justice of the Supreme Court, who is sitting with additional responsibility as a High Court judge, has been giving the Attorney General preferential treatment in the case.
He filed the affidavit in support of the motion on Friday.
This is the third time such motion is being filed by the former COCOBOD CEO, who has pleaded not guilty..
One resulted in the Supreme Court prohibiting Justice Honyenuga from continuing tohear the matter but an enhanced panel of the apex court overturned that ruling, thus, reinstating him on the case.
“Based on the averments contained in the above, it is only fair and just that the trial judge recuses himself from further hearing of the suit.”
In his affidavit, he said: “I state further that this conduct of the learned judge in unilaterally imposing dates did not happen when the prosecution was presenting its case.
During that time, the learned judge always agreed with the lawyers before adjourning the case.
Unfortunately, the learned judge has refused to grant me the same conditions and facilities which were afforded to the prosecution.”
Dr Opuni also said Justice Honyenuga “has exhibited open hostility toward me since I opened my defense and this is evident where he (the learned judge), in open court, apart from not hearing my counsel concerning adjourned dates, bangs his files on his table when giving dates and on his own, orders the court to rise while angrily screaming ‘court rise’.
Indeed, at the last hearing on the 9th day of December 2021, the learned trial judge unilaterally adjourned the suit at a time my lawyer was on his feet and addressing him concerning the proposed adjourned dates and walked away to his chambers.”
The conduct of the judge, Dr Opuni averred, breached his right to a fair hearing and also constitutes a breach of Rule 3 (5) of the code of conduct for judges and magistrates, which stipulates that: ‘A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice, A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status, and shall require Court personnel and others not to do so.’
Additionally, Dr Opuni argued that “the fact that the judge is biased toward me is evidence by his prejudicial comment, which he made in court on the 9th day of December 2021 where he stated in open court that the evidence of my witnesses cannot exonerate me save my evidence”.
“This shows a clear case of bias and that the learned judge has already made his mind even though my first witness has not yet completed his evidence-in-chief. I add that this comment is further evidence that the learned trial judge would not consider the evidence of my witness even though he has not completed his evidence-in-chief.”
The affidavit continued: “That during the examination-in-chief of my first witness, when my lawyer sought to elicit a response from my witness on portions of the findings of fact made by the judge in his ruling dismissing our application for submission of no case, including the above, the learned trial judge stopped him and furiously informed him that he was not going to allow my lawyer to ask questions by referring to his ruling”.
This conduct, Dr Opuni noted, “is one of bias since the questions to be asked are based on the express finding made by the judge concerning the submission of no case in which the judge made extensive references to the evidence of various prosecution witnesses affirming the basis of his ruling”.
The recusal motion will be moved on December 16, 2021.
ghanaweb
