MPs didn’t approach Joe Ghartey C’ttee – Member

A member of the Joe Ghartey Committee, Ben Abdallah Banda, says they wrote to members of Parliament’s Appointments Committee to help with investigations into the bribery claim, but did not receive the needed response.

Ben Abdallah Banda says apart from North Tongu Member of Parliament (MP) Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa who sent in a memo, no other member of the committee presented information in support of the claim.

Commenting on the issue on Monday, the Offinso South MP said the committee could have compelled legislators to appear before it to testify, but they could not be forced to speak.

“We wanted anybody who had any information to come forward willingly,” he said.

The Joe Ghartey Committee that investigated a bribery allegation against some MPs has been accused by a section of the public of failing to invite some key witnesses.

The corruption allegation was leveled by the Bawku Central MP, Mahama Ayariga who said some National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs on the Appointments Committee were offered GHC3,000 each.

The MP, a legal practitioner, said Minority Chief Whip, Mohammed Muntaka who handed out the money claimed it was a gift from Energy Minister, Boakye Agyarko whose nomination was under consideration.

Mr Ayariga told journalists the NDC MPs returned the money because they considered it as a bribe for the approval of Mr. Agyarko.

But the Joe Ghartey Committee set up following a motion filed on the floor of Parliament said it found no evidence to support the claim that money was given to some MPs as bribe.

It said its investigations revealed the Bawku Central MP acted on a rumour which was in the media.

He cited the Tamale North MP, Alhassan Suhuyini and Odododiodio MP, Nii Lante Vanderpuye as some of the people who were not invited.

But Mr. Banda said they wrote to the 25-member Appointments Committee of which the two MPs are members but they did not reply.

He said the Committee could have invited them, but it did not want to compel anyone to testify.

For him, if the two or any other member had any useful information relevant to the probe, they had an obligation to supply the Committee with same.

Their failure to submit any memos, he stressed, was a clear indication that they didn’t have any relevant facts and that there was, therefore, no point inviting them to testify.



Pix- Mr. Banda


Print Friendly

Leave a Comment